By Dr. Killeen, published on April 8, 2026
I have never seen a plastic surgeon or a surgeon of any type go after the rest of the team after a poor outcome with a patient.
Many people remember the tragic case of Rachel Tussey, a TikTok influencer who passed away following a mommy makeover procedure. There's now an unusual development: her surgeon, Dr. Tork, is suing the surgery center and the anesthesia group — not the patient's family, but the facility and team that worked alongside him.
Dr. Killeen has never seen this before, and it raises a lot of questions about what actually happened that day.
Dr. Tork filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages in excess of $25,000 for each claim, including:
His claims include several striking allegations:
The lawsuit states that the anesthesiologist said the patient was a "lightweight" and only required 100 mics of fentanyl through the entire nine-hour surgery. Despite this, she was reportedly given 150 mics of fentanyl and half a milligram of Dilaudid in a short period of time in the recovery room.
Dr. Tork states that when he returned to the same surgery center for another procedure on March 2nd, the paperwork for Rachel's case was different than what he had seen before. He alleges the staff fabricated dosages and timing in an attempt to cover up errors.
He also claims he received an email from the surgery center that was intended for a different doctor — and that email allegedly indicated staff were actively purging files related to Rachel's case.
The surgery center released a statement pushing back on the lawsuit. Key points include:
The Tussey family's legal team has stated they are prepared to pursue aggressive legal action on the family's behalf. The anesthesia group declined to comment.
Dr. Killeen has never seen a surgeon sue the rest of the surgical team after a poor patient outcome. Typically, when things go wrong, it's the patient's family that sues everyone involved — not the operating surgeon going after the surgery center or anesthesia group.
This dynamic raises questions that legal experts will need to weigh in on.
Dr. Killeen prefers not to speculate about what actually happened in cases like this. Here's why:
The best path to understanding the truth is through objective evidence from independent reviewers who have no stake in the outcome — the medical board, the courts, and independent medical experts. That process takes time, but it's the most fair approach for everyone involved: the doctors, the nurses, and most importantly, the family.
What we know for certain is that this was a terrible tragedy that should never have happened. It deserves aggressive investigation so that if anything preventable occurred, it can be prevented from ever happening again. The full story will likely emerge through the legal and medical review processes — and at that point, there may be lessons for the entire plastic surgery community.