For silicone implants, start imaging at five years, then every other year, and go yearly after ten. MRI or ultrasound, not both. Mammogram is good for breast tissue, not for imaging implants.
Replying to a question from a follower about how to monitor breast implants with imaging — specifically as a patient with saline textured implants.
There's a lot of confusion in this space — patients get conflicting advice from plastic surgeons, primary care docs, OB-GYNs, and imaging centers. Here's how I break it down.
For saline implants, there is no specific imaging recommendation. And there's a simple reason:
So if you have saline implants, you don't need to routinely schedule implant-monitoring imaging. You only need imaging if something changes visibly or physically that raises concern.
Silicone implants are a different story, because a ruptured silicone implant can sit there for years without any obvious outward change. That's why silicone implants come with actual imaging recommendations.
For patients with silicone implants, here's the framework I use:
If you're in silicone implants long-term, I'd rather catch a quiet rupture early than find it years later when it's already caused complications.
Originally, the FDA recommendation was MRI only for implant integrity monitoring.
In 2019, the recommendations were updated to include MRI or ultrasound — not both, just one or the other.
Most patients end up going with ultrasound because it is:
So unless there's a specific reason to get an MRI, ultrasound is usually the practical choice.
Mammograms are for breast tissue, not for implant integrity. Here's the distinction:
Sometimes mammograms catch silicone ruptures incidentally, but they frequently miss them. Don't assume your annual mammogram is double-duty covering your implants — it's not.
Here's a great workflow I wish more patients knew about:
This is an efficient way to get both done at once instead of booking separate visits.
This is an important one to know before you drive across town:
If the answer is no, find another facility — or ask your plastic surgeon, since many of us do this imaging in-office.
This is also a call to my primary care and OB-GYN colleagues — please know these recommendations. Primary care docs are often the ones ordering imaging for their patients, and if they're not aware that silicone implants need ultrasound or MRI monitoring on a schedule, patients can go years without proper follow-up.
If you're a patient, it's worth making sure your primary care physician has your implant type, year of placement, and recommended monitoring schedule in your chart.
You mentioned you have textured implants — so this is worth specifically addressing.
Textured implants are associated with a rare cancer called BIA-ALCL (breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma).
The most common presenting symptom of BIA-ALCL is:
A sudden increase in the size of one breast
This is usually caused by fluid collecting around the implant (a "late seroma"). So if you have textured implants and you notice:
...it's important to be evaluated. We want to test the fluid around the implant to make sure it isn't BIA-ALCL.
This is important for every implant patient to be aware of, but especially important with textured implants, where the risk is elevated.
For saline implants: no routine imaging needed — you'll know when they rupture.
For silicone implants: start imaging at 5 years, then every other year, and go yearly after 10 years. MRI or ultrasound — not both. Mammogram does not cover this.
For textured implants of any kind: be extra aware of sudden size changes, and don't ignore them. It's almost always benign fluid, but we need to make sure.
If you've been in your implants for a while and you've never had an integrity scan, now is a great time to get on schedule — it's easy, it's often covered, and peace of mind is worth the hour it takes.