So the typical recovery for my patients, whether or not I take a capsule out, is that for the first week or so, people usually feel pretty good.
Let me walk through how recovery from explant surgery actually looks, including the difference between removing implants under vs. over the muscle, what adding a capsulectomy does to your recovery, and why I really don't want anyone being talked into an en bloc capsulectomy unless they actually need one.
This is a topic where the surgical decisions you make really do shape how easy or hard your recovery is.
When we remove implants, the biggest factor affecting recovery is whether the implant was placed under the muscle or over the muscle.
If your implant was placed under the muscle, two things tend to happen with recovery:
In my own practice, the difference is small because I do:
With these, I don't see a big difference in recovery between under-the-muscle and over-the-muscle explants. But I've also had surgery in both positions personally, and under-the-muscle is genuinely more tender.
If your implant was placed over the muscle (subglandular or subfascial), recovery is generally easier:
So all things equal, over-the-muscle explants are a softer recovery.
Now let's talk about capsulectomies and how they affect your recovery.
There's a study from the CosmetAssure database that's worth knowing about. CosmetAssure is a special insurance that plastic surgeons can purchase to cover patients' complications from cosmetic procedures (since regular health insurance sometimes won't).
When they looked at patients having implant removal with vs. without capsulectomy, adding a capsulectomy raised the risk of major complications, mainly bleeding (hematoma), though the overall risk stays low.
In other words: capsulectomy is not free. It carries real complication risk.
The more extensive the surgery, the more chances something can go wrong.
Some surgeons will use drains after capsulectomies. I don't, but if your surgeon does, that makes your recovery a bit more annoying:
I don't want to leave the impression that capsulectomy is never appropriate. There are real indications:
For BII / SSBI symptoms without one of the above, capsulectomy is not supported by the evidence and unnecessarily raises your complication risk.
This is where I genuinely get fired up.
No one should be having an en bloc capsulectomy with their implant removal unless they have BIA-ALCL or BIA-SCC. Full stop.
The "rim of normal tissue" part is what makes it en bloc. It's an oncologic technique borrowed from cancer surgery, used so cancer cells don't spill during removal.
The only legitimate indication for en bloc capsulectomy is documented cancer of the capsule: BIA-ALCL or BIA-SCC. Both of those cancers are rare enough that essentially nobody should be having an en bloc operation. The operation is overkill for everything else.
Some women with BII symptoms are told they're more likely to feel better if their implants are removed en bloc.
Multiple studies in multiple countries have shown this is not true. The way the implant is removed does not change the rate of symptomatic improvement. (See what the studies show about BII and the capsule for more detail.)
If a surgeon does an en bloc on you without a cancer diagnosis, the recovery is meaningfully worse:
For my patients undergoing explant, with or without capsulectomy, here's what recovery generally looks like:
If your implant was under the muscle:
But by one month out, recovery converges for both groups.
If you're thinking about explant surgery, please understand the real recovery costs of each option:
If a surgeon is recommending en bloc for your BII symptoms, please get another opinion before agreeing to it. You can find a surgeon who will do the right operation without putting you through the unnecessary version of the procedure.
Explant recovery is shaped by two things: whether your implant was under or over the muscle, and whether you have a capsulectomy.
The right operation for you depends on your specific anatomy and diagnosis, not on what you've read online. Please don't let anyone talk you into an en bloc you don't need. There's no upside to it for non-cancer indications, and the downsides are real.
Every person deserves to feel comfortable and confident in their own body. Our procedures aren't just about physical change. They're about reclaiming your life, your comfort, and your self-assurance.
Dr. Killeen and her team support you every step of the way, from your first consultation through recovery.
Take the first step toward the life you deserve.
Schedule Your ConsultationEvery person deserves to feel comfortable and confident in their own body. Our procedures aren't just about physical change. They're about reclaiming your life, your comfort, and your self-assurance.
Dr. Killeen and her team support you every step of the way, from your first consultation through recovery.
Take the first step toward the life you deserve.
Schedule Your ConsultationRelated Articles

How Many Opioid Pills Should You Get After a Mastectomy With Implant Reconstruction?
April 13, 2026
Dr. Killeen explains the evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines after mastectomy with implant reconstruction, why the numbers are lower than you'd expect, and the multimodal protocol that makes it possible.

Do All Explants Need Total Capsule Removal Because of "Toxins"? No — Here's the Evidence
August 14, 2025
Dr. Killeen answers the common question of whether the toxins causing BII stay in the implant capsule and therefore require total capsule removal. The answer: no identified BII toxin, no measurable difference in heavy metals between capsules and unrelated tissue, and no outcome benefit from capsule removal in BII patients.

Six Months of Using Journavx in My Post-Op Patients: Here's How It's Going
August 28, 2025
Dr. Killeen reports honest six-month results using Journavx (suzetrigine), the new non-opioid pain medication, in her post-op patients — including dramatically reduced opioid use, less intraoperative opioid from anesthesia, and concerns about future cost when the manufacturer coupon expires.